Advertisement

FPJ Legal: Trial will take own time, not proper to keep accused in custody, says court on Raj Kundra's bail

08:09 PM Sep 21, 2021 | Bhavna Uchil

A magistrate court that granted bail on Monday to businessman Raj Kundra in the pornography case has said in its detailed order while granting the relief, that the trial will take its own time and in such circumstances, it will not be proper to keep the accused in custody.

It said he is ready to abide by the court’s bail conditions and the investigation is completed as the chargesheet was filed on September 15.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The court relied on an apex court order where the top court had observed that the accused cannot be kept behind bars for an inconsiderable period when the investigation is completed. The magistrate said in the order that only on the grounds that further probe is ongoing, the accused cannot be kept behind bars till the conclusion of the trial. It added that the offences do not provide for imprisonment for more than seven years.

Advertisement

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate SB Bhajipale further said that the element of inducement which is the prime ingredient of cheating appears to be missing from the case of the prosecution.

The order stated that it cannot be said that there is a possibility of tampering with evidence as the investigating officer has taken care to record the statement of witnesses before a magistrate and the server, laptops and mobiles of Viaan Industries are already in the officer’s custody.

The court referred to the statement of a witness Megha Jaiswal, an accountant at Kundra’s firm Viaan Industries. The court said it appears her statement was recorded to connect the accused with the transactions of Viaan Industries. “However, from her statement only it can be gathered that transactions took place between Kenrin and Hotshots and out of said transactions, there was an exchange of amounts. However, exchange of amount is not an offence levelled against the accused in the present chargesheet.”

The crime branch has accused Kundra’s firm Armsprime Media Pvt. Ltd of developing the Hotshots app that broadcast obscene content. The app was later sold to his brother-in-law Pradip Bakshi’s UK firm Kenrin, but Kundra managed the app for a fee.

The 45-year-old though his advocate Prashant Patil and Swapnil Ambure had claimed bail saying he was falsely implicated in the case.

Also Read: FPJ Legal: NCLT admits SBI plea for insolvency against Malad firm for default in repaying over Rs 400 crore

(To view our epaper please Read Now. For all the latest News, Mumbai, Entertainment, Cricket, Business and Featured News updates, visit Free Press Journal. Also, follow us on Twitter and Instagram and do like our Facebook page for continuous updates on the go)

Advertisement